Everyday, at the very most every day, when the mail is delivered to our home, and we receives up to a half dozen (and often more) mail-in solicitations from charities. Similar requests is sent to us by Email.

Although some may consider this an inconvenience, or a waste or even harassment by charities I do not. I find the flow to be acceptable, and the charity's efforts to solicit donations as legitimate, and their imposing of the solicitation upon me is not an issue and, in fact, an opportunity. This is not a problem in the perspective of the best way to deal with or remove the mail, or how to stop from the flow. It's rather a question of the best way to respond with a morally responsible and appropriate way. Donate for child education

So, if I have a decision that I am not going to reject, throw away, or do nothing What is the best course of action? Do I have to give it the amount, and what should I give? The household we live in, as could be described as typical has enough money to pay for the necessities, and some other amenities however, we're not living in luxurious surroundings. We have standard brand (Chevy, Pontiac) cars and live in a small single-family home, and consider Saturday night in the pizza joint as a night out and lower the temperature to keep our utility costs low.

Contributing to the cause is therefore within our capabilities however, it is not without sacrifices or sacrifice.

Then what should we do? How much? Let's take a look (and eliminate) the initial worries that could be a reason to deflect, minimize or make it impossible to donate.

The legitimacy and effectiveness of Charities Stories are more frequent than is desirable, exposing untrustworthy individuals who rely on people's feelings and use fake charity websites to solicit donations however, they keep the funds. Some stories expose poor-quality actions taken by charities, like overpaid salaries, ineffective marketing expenses, and lack of supervision. mid day meal So why should we donate?

Although interesting, these stories, when I look at the news, are unusual cases. These stories are considered newsworthy because of the reality that they are unusual. Do I believe in mainline charities like Salvation Army, or Catholic Charities and Doctors without Borders, do I think they are inefficient or corrupt as to justify my decision to not give? No. Instead, the best option to anyone who may has concerns about a charity should be to investigate the organization, verify and determine if they are worthy and not just put one's responsibility aside.

government and business Rolle The role of business and government Some might argue that the it is the government (by their programs) and business (through its donations as well as community services) should take care of charitable needs and concerns. Both businesses and the government have more resources than any individual or group can access.

If I look back, I cannot make use of this argument to evade my role. ngo for children Government requires taxes and the political consensus, both of which are undetermined, to run charitable and social programs, and business isn't sufficient involved in charitable giving take on the full burden.

Worth our amenities The majority of people who have a moderate but comfy status have achieved it by sacrificing, and the effort of scholastics, perseverance, and discipline. This is why we should not be required to, feel guilt when we reward ourselves and our families by providing amenities. The word "amenities" doesn't mean a lack of luxury. Rather, they are things that are positive and worthy of praise, i.e. instruction summer camps, travel to educational destinations purchasing healthy meals, or getting the family together for an evening baseball match.

Although we have earned the privileges we enjoy however, in a larger sense, we didn't acquire our fame at the age of our birth. Many financially stable family members and individuals were fortunate enough to grow up in an economically productive setting with the possibility of education and freedom to search for and obtain jobs and opportunities to advance.

If we are blessed with that fortune, if born in safe, secure, and fairly prosperous circumstances most of us wouldn't alter our status at birth to have been born under the tyranny that is North Korea, or a city slum in India or a devastated urban area within the Middle East, or doctorless village in Africa or a dying municipal area in Siberia or, since it's true that the Western world isn't always perfect an under-developed community within America. U.S., or a nomadic steppe with a cold wind within South America. donation for education The majority of our success is the result of our personal efforts. However, a lot of success is due to the chance to influence of the status that our lives were shaped.

Economic Dislocation - Doesn't that make it an even game? Spending money on items that are expensive (e.g. glasses with designer labels, cocktails in the finest lounge) or even giving up certain things (fasting eating a meal) in order to donate to charities can create economic ripples. In the process of converting expenditure to charity as we cut back on spending and also employment at the same time, in firms and companies that offer the items we've sacrificed. These ripples do not impact only those with wealth. Employment ripples affect those who are considered to be meritorious people, e.g. students who pay for their college, pensioners relying on dividends, urban youngsters working hard, middle income earners providing for their families.

In reality whether for good or bad any purchase including those that involve charitable donations, causes employment ripples and creates winners as well as losers. A visit to the ball games is different from going at the park shopping from a local restaurant compares to shopping at a major supermarket, clothes manufactured in Malaysia against clothes produced in Vietnam Each purchase will ultimately determine a winner and an unlucky one, creates jobs for some , and decreases the number of jobs for other people.

This means that this issue of purchasing decisions changing employment patterns, can be seen throughout the entire economy. What is the best way to handle it? In a broad sense social and government structures must ensure flexibility and freedom of employment to ensure that people are able to move (relatively) easily between companies or locations, and even sectors. The public policy issue of the dislocation of jobs because of economic changes is a major concern however at the end of the day, it will not, and even more importantly is not resolved by not giving.

Donations to charities are a way of shifting the work force, not diminish it. Is it true that employment in the charity sector create substantial jobs? Yes, I'd say so. Consider an example, City Harvest New York. City Harvest collects otherwise surplus food items, and distributes them to the people in need. In order to accomplish this, the organization employs truck drivers and dispatchers, outreach staff program managers, researchers and so on. These are positions that are skilled, within those within the New York City urban boundaries that do meaningful work, with a strong career path. In most cases, for the typical city dweller the positions are an upgrade from the grocery store clerks and fast food.

Obligation and Methods Although there is a fine line here it is best seen as an act of kindness and a voluntary expression of the heart and not based solely on obligation, which weighs on one's heart as guilt. The typical and normal person has no responsibility for the circumstances or circumstances that require charitable giving. In addition, the typical person doesn't have excessive or even significant money to give away.

Therefore, if the typical person does not bear any responsibility to the sufferings of the world and also lacks the ability to tackle them individually One could argue that there is no obligation to act. mid day meal scheme You can choose to be generous or not, without obligation, and without any obligation and without guilt if we do not accept the solicitations that come our way.

With a tiny margin however, I think otherwise. If I consider the value of the final dollar I may spend on myself to the benefits of food to hungry children, medication for a dying patient or a sanctuary for dying species, I am not able to conclude that charitable giving is only a form of an act of generosity that is a pleasant option to contemplate, maybe during my spare time. The gap between the small marginal benefit I get from spending the last dollar for myself and the massive and potentially life-saving benefit that one person would gain from a dollar donated is so huge that I believe that I in particular as well as all people in general are bound to contribute.